In 1946 Dr. Pottenger wrote, "Ordinary cooking precipitates proteins, rendering
them less easily digested. Probably certain albuminoids and globulins are
physiologically destroyed. All tissue enzymes are heat labile and would be
materially reduced or destroyed. Vitamin C and some members of the B complex are
injured by the process of cooking." Is the government really justified in
claiming that raw and pasteurized milks have the same benefits?
An extensive court case involving testimony by practicing doctors, chemists, and
bacteriologists reversed an ordinance which would have banned raw milk in
Missouri in the years when this controversy began. The judge wrote, "It was
shown that doctors generally require raw milk for ailing babies and children;
that children who could not fluorish on pasteurized milk usually improved in
health and flourished on raw milk." My personal opinion is that the raw milk
controversy is more a political action to protect large factory farms from
competition than it is a health issue. The government could easily enforce
certification of raw milk products rather than banning them.
The GNLD Difference
GNLD protein products are manufactured with an excluse low temperature
technology called the Protogard process. A blend of proteins are mixed together
and broken down with enzymes at body temperature. This process lifts the burden
of digestion of protein off the digestive organs. This is particularly important
for those with compromised digestive function. The use of enzymes to break down
the protein prevents the destruction of delicate amino acids destroyed by heat,
acids or bases. Protogard technology was pioneered by Dr. Arthur Furst, one of
the founders of the American College to Toxicology.
References:
Pottenger, Francis
M., Jr., The effect of heat-processed foods and metabolized vitamin D milk on
the dentofacial structures of experimental animals, Oral Surgery,
August 1946; 32(8): 467-485.
Douglass, William
Campbell, M.D., The Milk of Human Kindness is Not Pasteurized,
Marietta, GA: Last Laugh Publishers, 1985, 19.
No comments:
Post a Comment